Multi-leg options trading platform for Wealthscape


Background

What was the problem?

“Multi-leg” option (MLO) strategies are defined by the simultaneous trading of multiple option contracts, as opposed to individual, “single-leg” options traded one-at-a-time. Wealthscape, Fidelity’s enterprise brokerage platform for institutional investors (e.g., financial advisors), only offered single-leg options trading and had fallen behind its competitors in this regard. As a result, it was very difficult for our users to build and execute optimal MLO trades. Trading MLOs is a fundamental capability for institutional investors, so the successful design and development of such a trading tool (aka, “trade ticket”) represented a potential new revenue stream for Fidelity.

What didn’t we know?

  • Which MLO strategies are most important or useful to our users?
  • How do we identify existing pain points as well as potential pain points while designing a completely new product?

Segment of our project’s experience brief, or product design “vision”.

“Adding MLO functionality to our platform will streamline the advisor/rep order process, reduce errors, and create an additional revenue source.”

– A Fidelity analyst, 2018


Research

What insights did we seek—and gain?

Competitive analysis concluded that Fidelity was at a significant disadvantage in this area. While users could, and can, perform multiple concurrent single-leg options trades in attempts to emulate a MLO, doing so may result in price slippage (and thus inaccurate pricing data), undue risk, incurrence of unnecessary commissions and fees, and wasted time. We theorized that successful implementation of a MLO trading experience would (1) boost trade volume and revenue and (2) improve rates of new client acquisition and client retention.

We also relied on internal feedback from Fidelity’s own RIAs and BDs to learn about their pain points and preferences when interacting with a MLO trade ticket. Speed, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of options data were all of greatest importance in their workflows.



Test & Learn

How did we validate?

Our team partnered with a UX research group from a local university to conduct a moderated usability study and A/B test with our MLO trade ticket prototype. Ahead of the study, I collaborated with our analyst, team leader, and UX manager to build a user research brief that captured our goals and objectives, which then served as the basis of our moderated test guide.

Segment of our project’s user research brief, including desired outcomes and insights.

We tested four prototypes: two designs, for both RIAs and BDs separately. In the moderated test guide, I instructed our test conductor to guide each user through a series of tasks (i.e., simulated MLO trades) and ask specific questions to determine usability, pain points, and other insights to meet our research goals.

Segment of our project’s moderated test guide, including instructions for our test conductor.

The final readout and analysis of the user study concluded that, overall, the new MLO design was, in its current state, a near-success. User feedback was mostly positive, and feedback on specific elements of both the UX and visual design were constructive and used to further improve the design ahead of final implementation to Wealthscape.